Updated · NextMigrate Team

Why Companies Are Hiring From Everywhere But Paying Based on Where You Live
Imagine you are a senior backend developer in Lagos. You passed the same technical interview as a candidate in San Francisco. You push to the same repository. You sit in the same sprint meetings, often at 10 pm your time because that is when the US team is awake.
Then one day you see a salary leak on a forum. The person in San Francisco earns $185,000. You earn $45,000. Same company. Same code.
How would that feel? For many people it is the moment they first think seriously about moving.
The short answer: Most global employers set pay by where you live, not by what you do. They call it "localized compensation" or "geo-adjusted pay". Workers often call it the location discount. In Lagos or Lahore, it can mean 20 to 25 cents for every dollar a San Francisco colleague earns. It is legal. You can shrink it with hard-currency pay, better employers or your own business. Relocating is the only move that removes it.
How geo-based pay works
Most companies that hire globally use one of three models.
Model 1: Cost of living adjustment (COLA)
The company sets a base salary for the role, usually at US rates. Then it applies a multiplier based on where you live. Think of the multiplier as a dimmer switch on your salary. The job stays the same. Only the brightness changes.
Example: Senior Software Engineer Base = $160,000 (San Francisco)
| Location | COLA Multiplier | Adjusted Salary |
|---|---|---|
| San Francisco, USA | 1.0x | $160,000 |
| London, UK | 0.85x | $136,000 |
| Berlin, Germany | 0.72x | $115,200 |
| Toronto, Canada | 0.70x | $112,000 |
| Lisbon, Portugal | 0.50x | $80,000 |
| Bangalore, India | 0.30x | $48,000 |
| Lagos, Nigeria | 0.25x | $40,000 |
| Manila, Philippines | 0.28x | $44,800 |
| Cairo, Egypt | 0.22x | $35,200 |
| Lahore, Pakistan | 0.20x | $32,000 |
In Lagos, you earn 25 cents on the dollar. In Lahore, 20 cents. The work is identical.
Workers rarely get to check the multiplier. Cost-of-living indices vary a lot between providers (Numbeo, Mercer, the company's own data). The company usually picks the one that gives the lowest number. Two engineers in the same city, hired 18 months apart, can end up on different multipliers just because the benchmark was re-run.
Model 2: Local market rate
Here the company ignores US pay. It looks at local salaries in your country and offers a premium on top. This is often called "competitive local pay."
Example: Senior Software Engineer local market rates and typical remote company offers
| Country | Local Market Median | Remote Company Offer | Premium Over Local |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | $12,000-$18,000 | $35,000-$52,000 | 2-3x local |
| India | $24,000-$38,000 | $42,000-$68,000 | 1.5-2x local |
| Philippines | $16,000-$26,000 | $32,000-$50,000 | 1.5-2x local |
| Egypt | $9,000-$16,000 | $26,000-$42,000 | 2-3x local |
| Pakistan | $10,000-$19,000 | $30,000-$46,000 | 2-3x local |
It feels generous. You earn 2-3x the local rate. But next to US or European pay for the same work, you earn 20-35% of the package. Your pay is also tied to the weakest number available: the local median. In several of these countries, currency falls since 2023 have pushed that median down further.
Model 3: Equal pay everywhere
A few companies pay the same rate anywhere, or use only a light location factor.
| Company | Policy | Base Location |
|---|---|---|
| Basecamp (37signals) | Same pay globally, benchmarked to top 10% of SF/Chicago market | Chicago, USA |
| Oyster | Single global salary band per role, location-agnostic | Fully remote |
| GitLab | Location factor applied but published transparently in a compensation calculator | Fully remote |
| Automattic | Competitive global rates, lightly location-adjusted | Fully remote |
These are the exception. Most remote-first companies, including Shopify, Spotify, Stripe and Meta, adjust pay by location. Buffer was long the famous example of location-independent pay. In 2023 it moved to a system that still has a location band. So "equal pay everywhere" describes fewer employers than the phrase suggests.
Same role, same company, different countries
These bands come from public disclosures, platforms like Glassdoor, Levels.fyi and Blind, and pay transparency reports. They are total compensation ranges as of early 2026. Your offer will vary by company and negotiation.
Software engineering (mid-senior level)
| Company Type | USA (SF/NYC) | UK (London) | Canada (Toronto) | India (Bangalore) | Nigeria (Lagos) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAANG | $210K-$380K (TC) | $130K-$220K | $110K-$190K (CAD) | $45K-$90K | N/A (no offices) |
| Late-stage startup | $160K-$260K | $95K-$160K | $90K-$150K (CAD) | $38K-$70K | $32K-$58K |
| Remote-first company | $135K-$210K | $85K-$140K | $80K-$130K (CAD) | $32K-$60K | $28K-$50K |
| Early-stage startup | $105K-$170K | $65K-$110K | $65K-$100K (CAD) | $22K-$45K | $20K-$38K |
All figures in USD unless noted. TC = total compensation including equity.
Product design (senior level)
| Company Type | USA | UK | India | Philippines | Egypt |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Large tech | $170K-$270K | $85K-$150K | $32K-$58K | $27K-$48K | $19K-$37K |
| Remote-first | $125K-$190K | $75K-$120K | $27K-$48K | $22K-$40K | $16K-$32K |
| Agency/consultancy | $95K-$150K | $58K-$90K | $19K-$38K | $16K-$30K | $13K-$24K |
Data science and ML engineering (mid-senior)
| Company Type | USA | UK | Canada | India | Pakistan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAANG | $190K-$350K | $105K-$190K | $95K-$170K (CAD) | $45K-$85K | N/A |
| Remote-first | $140K-$215K | $80K-$130K | $75K-$115K (CAD) | $30K-$55K | $24K-$44K |
| Startup | $105K-$170K | $58K-$95K | $58K-$90K (CAD) | $22K-$42K | $17K-$32K |
The pattern repeats in every field. The bigger the equity part, the wider the gap, because equity is usually scaled from base salary. More on that below.
For one corridor with take-home figures, see our Naira vs dollar tech salary comparison.
What companies say, and where it falls apart
"Cost of living is lower, so you need less"
This is the most common argument. Rent in Lagos is cheaper than in San Francisco, so a smaller salary goes further. Partly true. Here are monthly costs for a comfortable middle-class life:
| City | Monthly Living Cost (Single Professional) | Monthly Living Cost (Family of 4) |
|---|---|---|
| San Francisco | $4,800-$6,800 | $8,500-$12,500 |
| London | $3,400-$5,000 | $6,200-$9,500 |
| Toronto | $3,000-$4,500 | $5,800-$8,500 |
| Bangalore | $900-$1,600 | $1,600-$3,200 |
| Lagos | $1,100-$2,200 | $2,200-$4,400 |
| Manila | $900-$1,500 | $1,600-$3,000 |
| Cairo | $650-$1,300 | $1,300-$2,700 |
| Lahore | $550-$1,100 | $1,100-$2,400 |
But look at what a cost-of-living adjustment counts, and what it leaves out.
What COLA captures: rent, groceries, transport, utilities, local services.
What COLA does not capture:
- International travel (same price everywhere)
- Technology (an iPhone or a MacBook costs the same, often more, in Lagos as in London)
- Quality healthcare (often more expensive in developing countries if you want international-standard care)
- Children's international education (same or higher cost)
- Savings and investment (your savings rate matters, not your spending rate)
- Property as an investment (global property markets do not adjust to your local salary)
- Retirement (you need roughly the same absolute amount to retire well)
- Currency risk (your local currency may lose 20-50% against the USD in a single year)
That last point is real. The Nigerian naira lost more than 60% of its dollar value across 2023-2024 after the currency was floated. The Egyptian pound was devalued sharply over the same period. If your salary is in local currency, it can shrink while you sleep. USD pay protects you. Many contracts do not offer it.
Here is a Nigerian developer on $40,000 next to a US developer on $160,000:
| Category | Lagos ($40K salary) | SF ($160K salary) | Ratio (Lagos as % of SF) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Annual rent | $6,000 | $36,000 | 17% |
| Groceries | $3,600 | $7,200 | 50% |
| iPhone (current model) | $1,200 | $1,200 | 100% |
| Flight to London | $850 | $850 | 100% |
| International school (per child) | $8,000 | $0 (public school) | N/A |
| Quality health insurance | $2,200 | $0 (employer covered) | N/A |
| Annual savings | $9,500 | $60,000 | 16% |
| Savings as % of income | 24% | 37.5% | N/A |
The Lagos developer earns 25% of the SF salary but saves only about 16% as much. Over a 20-year career, the SF developer builds well over $1.2M in savings. The Lagos developer builds a fraction of that. Same work. See the day-to-day version in Lagos vs London: the real numbers.
"We pay well above local rates"
True. That is why many remote workers feel grateful at first. Earning $40,000 in Lagos when local firms pay $12,000-$18,000 changes your life.
But the local rate is the wrong yardstick. Your work creates the same value as work done in San Francisco. The company is pricing you by your coordinates, not your output.
"The market sets the price"
If a company can hire an excellent engineer in Nigeria for $40,000, why pay $160,000? From the company's side, that is rational. It is also the heart of the problem. The remote job market is bent by:
- Visa rules that stop workers from moving freely
- Barriers to getting credentials recognised
- Banking and payment limits
- Time-zone preferences that weaken your bargaining power
- Not knowing what other companies pay
If the Lagos developer could move to San Francisco freely, the company would have to pay the SF rate to keep them. The discount exists because your movement is limited. That is why relocation resets the whole equation. See remote work abroad vs migrating for how the two paths split.
What the discount costs over a career
Picture two developers who start at the same time with the same skills.
Developer A stays in Bangalore and works remotely for US companies. Strong performer, promoted on time.
Developer B moves to Toronto and works for similar companies in person or hybrid.
| Career Year | Developer A (Bangalore) | Developer B (Toronto, CAD converted to USD) |
|---|---|---|
| Year 1 (Junior) | $25,000 | $55,000 |
| Year 3 (Mid) | $40,000 | $80,000 |
| Year 5 (Senior) | $55,000 | $110,000 |
| Year 8 (Staff) | $72,000 | $148,000 |
| Year 12 (Principal) | $88,000 | $178,000 |
| Year 15 (Director) | $105,000 | $215,000 |
| Cumulative earnings (15 years) | ~$880,000 | ~$1,850,000 |
Developer B earns roughly $970,000 more over 15 years. Take off Toronto's higher living costs (roughly $15,000-$20,000 more per year), and B is still ahead by $650,000-$720,000 in savings.
And that leaves out:
- Employer-matched retirement contributions (typical in Canada: 3-6% match)
- Larger stock grants for higher-base employees
- Health and dental insurance (largely employer-paid in Canada)
- Employment insurance and government benefits
- Mortgage access (a working banking system versus mortgage rates of 20%+ in Nigeria or double digits in India)
- A path to citizenship and a stronger passport, which helps your children too
What would that gap mean for your family? A house? A child's university fees paid in cash? Time with your parents while they are still well?
The equity gap is even wider
Equity is like a tip calculated as a percentage of the bill. A smaller base salary means a smaller grant, and every rise in the share price multiplies that difference.
| Level | US Employee Total Comp | Of Which Equity | India Remote Total Comp | Of Which Equity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Engineer | $210,000 | $65,000-$85,000 | $55,000 | $5,000-$10,000 |
| Staff Engineer | $310,000 | $105,000-$155,000 | $75,000 | $10,000-$20,000 |
| Principal Engineer | $460,000 | $185,000-$260,000 | $100,000 | $15,000-$30,000 |
A US staff engineer might get $105K-$155K in equity each year. The India-based peer might get $10K-$20K. If the stock rises 3x over five years (common for successful startups), the US engineer gains $315K-$465K. The India-based engineer gains $30K-$60K. Same code. A tenfold difference in wealth.
Not sure which country you’d qualify for?
6 quick questions about your age, skills and English. Free, 2 minutes, results on screen. No sign-up.
Free eligibility check →How the system keeps itself in place
Pay zones
Most global companies split the world into pay zones. It works like seats on a plane. Everyone lands at the same time, but the ticket price depends on where you boarded.
| Zone | Typical Countries | Multiplier |
|---|---|---|
| Zone 1 (Tier 1) | SF, NYC, Seattle, Zurich | 1.0x |
| Zone 2 (Tier 2) | London, Sydney, Toronto, Berlin | 0.75-0.85x |
| Zone 3 (Tier 3) | Lisbon, Prague, Buenos Aires, Dubai | 0.50-0.65x |
| Zone 4 (Tier 4) | Bangalore, Lagos, Manila, Cairo, Lahore | 0.20-0.35x |
To change zones, you usually need to relocate and get a fresh offer. Some companies cut pay if you move from a higher zone to a lower one. Google and Meta both brought in location-based pay changes for staff who moved away from expensive offices, and the policy remains in force.
Pay transparency laws stop at the border
In the US, states such as Colorado, California, New York, Washington and Illinois (whose posting rule took effect in 2025) now require salary ranges on many job ads. The EU Pay Transparency Directive will bring similar rules across member states, with national laws due by June 2026. But these laws only reach where they reach. A company posting $150K-$210K for a US engineer does not have to say what it pays for the same role in Nigeria or India.
So US and EU staff can negotiate against published ranges. You often have no idea what your peers earn for the same work.
"You can always leave"
Companies know that even with a discount, they beat local pay. A Nigerian developer on $40,000 has little leverage to ask for $80,000 because:
- Local alternatives pay $12,000-$18,000
- Other remote-first companies also apply location discounts
- Very few companies pay "equal pay everywhere"
- Visa rules stop the developer from simply relocating
The company holds the power. Not because of any skill gap, but because your passport limits where you can go.
What workers are doing about it
Some responses are much safer than others.
Strategy 1: VPNs and fake locations
Some workers claim to live in Lisbon or Dubai while working from Lagos or Bangalore. This can get you fired on the spot. It may count as contract fraud. It creates tax problems in both the claimed and the real country. Payroll providers now flag mismatched IP, banking and tax-residency data, so it is getting easier to catch. We do not recommend it.
Strategy 2: Working for several companies
Because many are paid as contractors, some workers hold two or three "full-time" remote jobs at once. At $35,000-$50,000 each, three jobs can bring $105K-$150K. This is sometimes called "overemployment," and it is growing. It works until deadlines clash, two on-call shifts collide, or an employer finds out and enforces an exclusivity clause. It also multiplies your tax filing and often breaches your contract.
Strategy 3: Building your own business
Some professionals build products, agencies or consultancies that charge global rates. A Nigerian design agency can charge US clients $150-$200/hour, the same as a US agency, when the quality matches. The trade-off: you take on sales, client risk and uneven cash flow. In return, nobody caps your income by postcode.
Strategy 4: Relocating
This is the most complete answer. Once you count promotions, equity, benefits and long-term wealth, many professionals decide that moving is the rational choice.
| Factor | Stay Remote (Lagos) | Relocate (Toronto) |
|---|---|---|
| Salary | $45,000 | ~$110,000 (CAD ~$150K) |
| Relocation cost | $0 | $15,000-$25,000 (one-time) |
| Higher living costs | $0 | ~$15,000/year more |
| Net annual income advantage | N/A | $35,000-$45,000/year |
| Break-even on relocation costs | N/A | Under 1 year |
| 10-year cumulative advantage | N/A | $350,000-$500,000 |
The $15,000-$25,000 move pays for itself inside the first year. Every year after is extra, plus benefits, equity and a route to permanent residence that remote work never gives you.
If you are weighing this, Canada's points system is one of the more open routes for engineers and other in-demand professionals. Start with our Canada Express Entry guide for developing countries and the migrate to Canada overview.
If you are stuck on the discount for now
Relocation may not be possible yet. You still have moves, roughly in order of impact:
- Get paid in a hard currency. Ask for USD or EUR pay. This removes the currency-fall tax and is often the most valuable thing you can win.
- Benchmark against the role, not your city. Quote the company's own US or EU band (much of it now published by law), not the local median.
- Target "light location factor" employers. GitLab, Oyster, Automattic and 37signals publish or reduce their location adjustment. Find these before you accept the first offer.
- Push equity, not just base. If base is capped by zone, ask for a bigger equity grant or a signing bonus. The multiplier is often applied less strictly there.
- Know your tax position early. Working as a local contractor for a foreign company has real filing rules. Our tax trap for remote workers guide covers them.
- Keep a relocation option warm. Keep your IELTS scores valid, your CV full of measured results, and your documents ready (references, degree evaluations). Then you can move fast when a sponsored role or points-based opening appears.
Frequently asked questions
Is geo-based pay legal?
Yes, in almost every country. The difference must be based on location, not on a protected trait such as race, sex or nationality. It is a business practice, not a breach of employment law.
Do any big companies really pay the same everywhere?
Very few. 37signals (Basecamp) benchmarks globally to a top US market rate, and Oyster uses one global band per role. Most others, including Buffer, now apply at least a location factor. "Equal pay everywhere" is rarer in 2026 than the marketing suggests.
If I move to a cheaper city, will my company cut my pay?
It can, if it uses pay zones. Google and Meta both adjust pay for staff who move away from high-cost offices. Check the remote-work clause in your contract before you move.
Is claiming a fake location worth the risk?
No. It can get you dismissed, may be treated as fraud, and creates tax problems in two countries at once. Payroll and tax-residency checks make it easier to catch every year. Push for hard-currency pay, better employers or relocation instead.
Does relocating really beat a high remote salary?
Usually, once you count equity, benefits, retirement matching, a stable currency and a path to residence and citizenship. The one-time move is often paid back within a year. Over a decade, the gap runs into the hundreds of thousands. See remote work abroad vs migrating.
You are not worth less because of your postcode
Geo-based pay is not going away. Companies gain from it, and there is no global minimum wage for remote work, no international enforcement and no free movement of workers.
But now you can see the price. You know what the discount costs you in salary, equity, currency risk and lifetime wealth. That lets you choose: negotiate harder, pick employers who shrink the discount, build income that charges global rates, or move so the discount no longer applies.
The companies doing this are not breaking the law. But the system quietly moves value from workers in developing countries to shareholders in rich ones. Your skills are the same wherever you open your laptop. If you want to see which countries would pay you for them in full, our free migration assessment takes about 2 minutes.