A Redacted Roadmap: Every Page of the Document We Send After a Consultation

A NextMigrate migration roadmap is a written PDF, usually nine to fourteen pages, built around one household's actual profile and delivered after the consultation. It has a fixed spine. Page one is the eligibility read: what your file contains, what each fact is worth in the systems being considered, and the single largest constraint. Pages two and three carry the shortlisted routes, usually two, each with the specific rule that let it survive, plus the routes that were considered and dropped with the rule that eliminated each one. Page four is the document checklist, with the issuing body named for every item and a realistic lead time beside it. Pages five and six are the sequencing calendar, which puts those documents in the order they have to happen so that nothing expires while something slower is still in a queue. Page seven is the cost table, where every fee carries the month it was checked and a re-check date. The final page states what was not assessed, what would change the answer, and the plain limits of the document.

This article walks through one real roadmap with every identifying detail removed and every figure replaced by a labelled planning range. It is general information. A licensed or registered adviser in your destination country should confirm any specific case before you file.

Why we publish the artifact instead of describing it

The most common objection to paying for a migration roadmap is reasonable: you cannot see what arrives until after you have paid. "A personalised plan" describes both a serious document and a two-page template with your name pasted in. So here is the document. The client is a composite with the profile flattened: an engineer in their mid-thirties with a partner and one child, a bachelor's degree from a South Asian university, seven years of work history including a self-employed stretch, one English test already sat, and residence in three countries since turning eighteen. Every figure below is a dated planning figure, as in a real roadmap. For what a paid consultation buys generally, our companion piece on what a migration consultation actually gives you sets out the boundaries.

Page one: the eligibility read

Page one recommends nothing. It restates your file back to you in the terms the immigration systems use, so you can catch an error before the rest of the document is built on it. It has four blocks.

The profile as recorded. Ages of everyone who would move, at the date of the document and at a realistic filing date. Qualification level, awarding country, year. Work experience split into what an assessing body is likely to count and what it may not. Language results with the date sat, because every route sets a window inside which a test result stays acceptable and that window is set by the immigration authority, not by the test provider. Our guide to the language test expiry clock covers how to read the current rule on the authority's own page. Residence history by country, which drives the police certificate list. Every refusal, anywhere in the world.

What each fact is worth. Points-based systems price your file, and the read shows that pricing per system, side by side. Age bands, qualification levels and language bands carry published values that IRCC, Australia's Department of Home Affairs and Immigration New Zealand publish and revise on their own schedules. The roadmap states the band your profile falls into and tells you to reconfirm the current table on the authority's page.

The binding constraint. One sentence naming what is most likely to decide the outcome. Here it was the self-employed stretch, because an assessment that will not count those years drops the experience total below what two candidate routes require. Our guide to proving self-employed experience covers the evidence it turns on.

What is missing. The facts unavailable at the consultation, which the rest of the document is conditional on. Here: no skills assessment, no partner language test, no confirmation the university will release transcripts to an assessing body.

Clients push back on page one more than any other page, which is the point. If your qualification year or duty description is wrong here, everything after it is wrong too.

Pages two and three: two routes that survived, four that did not

The shortlist is short on purpose. A list of six countries you might qualify for is a brochure. Two routes, each with the rule it survived, is a decision. Each surviving route gets the same five fields.

The rule that let it through. The published criterion, quoted in the words the authority uses: the occupation appears on the relevant list under a code your duties support, the qualification meets the minimum, the age band still earns points, and the language result clears the route's floor with margin. Each claim names the authority behind it.

What is still unproven. Here the occupation code depends on a skills assessment that has not happened, so the route is conditional on that result.

The step that has to happen first. One action, dated.

The realistic filing window. Always a range, with the assumptions that produced it written beside it.

What would close it. A negative assessment, a cut-off moving against the profile, a list revision.

The eliminated routes matter as much. Four were dropped in this file, and each has one line naming the rule that did it.

Route considered	Status	The rule that decided it
Canada, Express Entry (federal skilled)	Shortlisted, conditional	As published by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada: occupation supported at a skilled level, age band still scoring, foreign education assessable through an organisation IRCC has designated for credential assessments. Conditional on the assessment result, and on the score IRCC actually invites in a given round
Australia, points-tested skilled	Shortlisted, conditional	As published by the Department of Home Affairs: the occupation appears on a current skilled occupation list and the applicant holds a positive assessment from the assessing authority named for that occupation. Conditional on that assessment and on a higher English result. Lists and the invitation bar both move
United Kingdom, Skilled Worker	Eliminated	As published by the UK Home Office, the route runs on sponsorship: a job offer from an employer holding a sponsor licence, at or above the route's published salary and skill floors. The file has no offer, so the gate never opens. Verify the current floors on the Home Office page
Germany, skilled worker route	Eliminated	German skilled worker routes turn on formal recognition of the foreign qualification, assessed by the competent German recognition body for that profession. The degree had no clear equivalence entry to work from at the date of the document. Confirm the current position with the recognition authority for the occupation
New Zealand, skilled residence	Eliminated for now	Immigration New Zealand's skilled residence settings lean on skilled employment in New Zealand or occupational registration. Neither is present and neither is realistic inside the planning horizon. Check the current settings on the INZ page
Ireland, employment permit routes	Eliminated	Irish employment permits are issued by the Irish government department responsible for enterprise and employment permits, are employer-led, and are tested against published remuneration thresholds. With no offer the route cannot be sequenced from here

Every row is a planning read written on the date of the document. Occupation lists, salary floors and points tables are revised by IRCC, Australia's Department of Home Affairs, the UK Home Office, the German authorities responsible for recognition and labour market access, Immigration New Zealand and the Irish employment permits system on their own timetables, sometimes more than once a year. No figure or list membership in this article should be treated as current on the day you read it. The roadmap says so beside the table and tells you to reconfirm on the authority's own page before committing money to any row.

Note what the eliminations share: three of the four failed on the absence of a job offer. That finding is worth more than a longer shortlist, because it tells the household where the next six months should go. Our guide to skilled visa routes that work without a job offer is the general version.

Page four: the document checklist, with who issues each item

This is the page clients photograph and put on the wall. Every item names the body that issues it, because the most common planning error is assuming a document comes from somewhere convenient.

Item	Who issues it	Planning lead time	Where to confirm
Degree certificate and transcripts	The awarding university, often released only to the assessing body	Weeks to months, variable by institution	The university registrar
Educational credential assessment	A designated organisation named by the destination authority	Months, plus the transcript wait before it starts	The authority's list of designated organisations
Skills assessment for the occupation	The occupation's assessing authority	Months; varies sharply by body and occupation	The assessing authority's timeframes page
English language test	The approved test provider for that route	Booking window plus results; weeks	The route's list of accepted tests
Police certificate, country of citizenship	The national police authority, or the body that authority names for overseas applicants	Weeks to months as a planning range, longer from abroad	That authority's own application page
Police certificates, other countries of residence	Each country's own issuing body	Each on its own clock, run in parallel	Each authority's page
Birth and marriage certificates	The civil registry of the issuing country	Days to months, by registration history	The civil registry
Passports for every applicant	The passport authority	Renew early if under a year of validity	The passport authority
Medical examination	A panel physician approved by the destination authority	Late in the sequence; own validity clock	The authority's panel physician list
Proof of funds evidence	Your bank	The balance needs seasoning before it counts	The route's funds criteria page

Lead times belong to the issuing body. Nothing in a roadmap makes a police authority faster, so the roadmap starts the slow items first. Police certificates for every country you have lived in are usually the longest pole, which is why our police certificate guide stands alone.

Several of these documents also expire. A police certificate, a language result and a medical each carry a validity window, and they come from three unrelated organisations that will not coordinate. Ordering them in the wrong sequence is how people pay twice.

Page five and six: the sequencing calendar

The calendar turns the checklist into an order. It is drawn as months from the start date, so a two-week slip does not invalidate the page. The logic is simple to state and hard to run: start anything with a long queue and a long validity immediately, and hold anything with a short validity until the long items are nearly done. For this file the shape was:

Month 0 to 1. Request transcripts and confirm the release method. Order the police certificate from the country of citizenship. Book the English test for the earliest sitting that still allows real preparation.
Month 1 to 3. Lodge the credential assessment as soon as transcripts move. Order the remaining police certificates in parallel, one per country of residence. Start gathering evidence for the self-employed stretch: contracts, invoices, tax filings, client confirmations.
Month 3 to 6. Lodge the occupational skills assessment. Sit the English test. Decision point: if the assessment excludes the self-employed years, the roadmap's branch applies.
Month 6 to 9. With assessment and language in hand, enter the relevant expression-of-interest or candidate pool. Season proof of funds so the balance has sat long enough when it is examined.
Month 9 onwards. On invitation, file within the window the authority allows, book medicals then and no earlier, and check no police certificate has aged out.

Three decision points are marked with the branch written in advance: a narrowed skills assessment, an English result one band short, and an invitation round closing above the profile's score. Knowing the branch before the result lands keeps a bad month from becoming a lost quarter. Our guides on what to fix first when your points are too low and being one band short in English are the long forms of two of them.

Not sure which country you’d qualify for?

Take our free 2-minute eligibility assessment and get personalised results across 29 destinations, with no signup wall.

Start the free assessment →

What it costs: the cost table, with every fee dated

Page seven prices the plan. Every row carries the month the fee was checked and a re-check date, because government fees and assessing body charges are revised on published schedules and a stale figure in a budget is a real loss to a household.

A real roadmap uses the destination currency and the exact fee names from the authority's page. Here is the structure with the figures replaced by categories, because publishing a specific fee in an article read for a year is the error the dated-figure discipline exists to prevent.

Cost line	Charged by	How it behaves	When to re-check
Credential assessment	The designated assessment organisation	Flat fee per applicant, plus courier and verification charges	Before lodging
Occupational skills assessment	The assessing authority	Flat fee, often a separate fee for a review or appeal	Before lodging
English test	The test provider	Per sitting; budget two if a band is tight	At booking
Police certificates	Each national authority	Per country, often payable in local currency	At each order
Visa or residence application charge	The destination immigration authority	Per applicant including dependants; several authorities index annually	Before filing, and again if filing slips past indexation
Health surcharge or insurance	The destination authority or an insurer	Where charged, often per person per year of the grant	Before filing
Medical examination	The panel physician, privately	Per person, paid to the clinic	At booking
Translation and legalisation	Translators and the legalisation authority	Per document, and it multiplies across a family	At order
Proof of funds	Not a fee	A balance the household must hold and evidence. Most authorities that test funds set both an amount, which varies with family size, and a period the money must have been held	Before filing, on the authority's funds page

Two lines behave differently and the roadmap flags both. Application charges at several authorities are indexed or revised on an annual cycle, so a filing that slips past the revision date costs more than the budget said. Australia's visa application charges, for example, are set by the Department of Home Affairs and adjusted on a published annual cycle. Take the amount from the authority's own fee page on the day you pay. Where a destination charges a health surcharge, it is commonly assessed per person for each year of the permission granted, which is how a family of four on a multi-year grant meets a line that dwarfs the visa fee. The United Kingdom is the clearest example of a per-person, per-year immigration health charge, and the Home Office publishes the current rate and the exemptions. Read that page before budgeting, since the amount and the discounted rates are revised by regulation. Our guides to the real cost of migrating abroad and proof of funds by country carry both.

Every figure in the real table ends the same way: as published on the date shown, reconfirm on the issuing authority's own page before you budget or pay.

Page eight: what was not assessed, and what would change the answer

The last page separates a document you can trust from a sales artifact. It lists what the roadmap did not examine. For this file it read, in substance:

No legal advice was given. The document is general information organised around the profile supplied. It creates no adviser-client relationship and it is not representation.
No admissibility assessment was made. Character, criminal history, security and health inadmissibility are decided by the destination authority against its own criteria. Where a household has a health condition or anything on the record, a licensed or registered adviser there must confirm the position. Our piece on medical inadmissibility explains why this cannot be settled from a form.
No tax or financial advice was given. Exit taxes, residence rules and assets left behind are separate work.
No employer, agent or school was endorsed.
Nothing was verified with a government official. Every rule cited comes from a published authority page on a stated date and can change.
The read is only as good as the inputs. An undisclosed refusal, an unreported period of residence, or a duty description the employer would not confirm breaks the analysis.

Then the list of things that would change the answer:

A negative or narrowed skills assessment.
An English result above or below the band assumed.
A revision to the occupation list, the points table or a cut-off score.
A job offer appearing, which reopens three of the four eliminated routes.
A child crossing a dependant age ceiling, a risk our guide to children aging out of dependant status covers.
A change in the household's ability to fund the sequence.

No outcome is promised anywhere in the document, because the outcome belongs to a government case officer applying published criteria to your evidence. Nobody selling a roadmap has influence over that officer, over a processing queue, or over an invitation round.

Who this document is for

The roadmap earns its price for a specific kind of file.

Households with several plausible destinations and no way to rank them. The elimination pages are the value.
Occupations that exist under different codes in different systems, where the code decides which country is viable.
Regulated professions facing a registration body and an immigration authority on separate clocks.
Anyone carrying a complication: a prior refusal, a self-employed stretch, a degree an assessing body will not immediately recognise, a health matter in the household, or documents that are slow to obtain where you were born.

It is worth less for a single-country, clean-history, comfortably-scoring profile with an offer in hand. That is a form-filling exercise and the authority publishes the checklist for free. Our guide on whether you need a migration agent sets out a test for telling the two apart.

What you need before you start

The document is built from what you bring.

Full name and date of birth for everyone who would move.
Each qualification: awarding institution, country, year, and the exact title on the certificate.
Work history with dates, employers, titles and a plain description of duties. Duties decide skills assessments more than titles do.
Any language test already sat, with per-component scores and the date.
Complete immigration history for every applicant: refusals, entry refusals, overstays and removals, anywhere in the world.
Every country you have lived in since turning eighteen, with dates. Several authorities frame the police certificate requirement around a minimum period of residence in each country, commonly counted in months, and each authority publishes its own threshold and its own age cut-off. Confirm the threshold on the destination authority's checklist rather than assuming a number.
The budget available for fees, and any date forcing your hand, such as a birthday crossing a points band.

Withholding a refusal or a health issue to get a friendlier answer produces a roadmap for a person who does not exist.

How long it takes to receive

The consultation is booked once the deposit is paid, and the roadmap follows it. Drafting time goes on checking each cited rule against the issuing authority's current page, which is what makes the figures dated. The calendar inside runs on the issuing bodies' clocks: for this profile the window from starting to being ready to file was a planning range measured in quarters, paced by the assessments and the police certificates. Any provider quoting a firm number of weeks to a visa is quoting something they do not control.

When this does not work

Plain cases where a roadmap is the wrong purchase.

You have a live refusal decision and a deadline to challenge it. That is legal work with a clock on it. Take the letter to a licensed or registered adviser now. Our piece on appeal, reapply or change country after a refusal explains the fork, and when you need a lawyer explains the boundary.
Your case involves protection, asylum or a misrepresentation finding. Those need a lawyer.
You want someone to lodge for you. Lodging on your behalf is regulated activity in most destination countries.
The decision is already made and simple. One country, one route, an offer in hand. Read the authority's checklist and go.

How to check any provider before you pay

The markers of fraud in this market are consistent, and they apply to us as much as anyone.

Nobody can guarantee a visa. A guaranteed outcome, a "100% success rate", or an offer to expedite through a contact inside an immigration department is a marker of fraud.
Never pay for a job offer. Charging a worker for a sponsored job, or recovering the cost of a labour market document from the worker, is prohibited in several destination countries and attracts penalties that in some of them are criminal. The prohibition and the penalty are set by the destination country's immigration and employment legislation, so check the destination authority's own guidance on what an employer may and may not charge you. See paying for a job offer is a crime.
Never pay into a personal account, a personal wallet, or by irreversible cash transfer to an individual. Legitimate providers invoice a business.
Check the regulator before the reviews. Australia's register of migration agents, Canada's regulatory college for immigration consultants, the United Kingdom's statutory regulator of immigration advisers and the equivalent bodies elsewhere each publish a searchable register. Regulators are occasionally renamed or restructured, so find the current body from the destination government's own site, then search the register there. Our guide to checking a migration agent is licensed walks through it. Our piece on reasonable consultant fees gives the market ranges.

NextMigrate sells written planning work. We do not lodge applications, we do not represent you, and we do not promise outcomes.

Common mistakes readers make with a document like this

Treating the figures as current forever. Every number carries a re-check date. Confirm on the authority's own page before you pay it.
Starting with the fast documents. People book the English test first because it feels like progress, then discover the police certificate they needed six months ago.
Ordering medicals early. They carry a validity window and belong late in the sequence.
Ignoring the eliminated routes. The reason a route closed usually tells you what to fix.
Filing a complicated case without a licensed adviser.
Assuming the plan survives a changed input. A new job offer, a new baby, a birthday crossing a band: each means the document needs revising.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I see a full sample roadmap before I pay?

This article is the walkthrough, page by page, with the client and the figures removed. A complete document cannot be published even with names taken out, because the combination of occupation, country, qualification year and family shape identifies a household.

How many pages is it?

Typically nine to fourteen. One viable route and a clean history makes a shorter document, which is the right answer for that case. Two live routes, a regulated occupation and a complication run longer as the branches and the checklist grow.

Are the timelines in the calendar promises?

No. They are planning ranges built from the issuing bodies' published timeframes on the date of writing, and each carries an instruction to reconfirm. Those bodies revise their timeframes on their own schedules.

What if a rule changes after I receive the document?

The dated figures and re-check dates exist for that. The document names the page to check and roughly how often that authority revises it. A material change to a shortlisted route, such as an occupation leaving a list, means revisiting the plan before spending on the affected step.

Does the roadmap replace a licensed migration agent or lawyer?

No, and it says so in writing. It is general information organised around your profile. Where your case touches admissibility, a refusal on the record, a character or health matter, or a protection claim, an adviser licensed or registered in the destination country has to confirm the position.

What if the honest answer is that no route fits me right now?

You get that answer in writing, with the rule that closes each route and the input that would reopen one. Learning it in a document is cheaper than learning it after paying for a credential assessment aimed at a programme you cannot enter.

How does the payment work?

The personal migration roadmap is priced at $499, reduced from $999, and is started with a $99 deposit, with the balance settled afterwards. That is our own published price and it can change, so the pricing page is the figure to rely on. It also sets out what arrives.

What to do next

Start with the free eligibility assessment. It takes your occupation, qualifications, age, language results and family situation and shows which routes those inputs actually reach. For a clean, single-country, well-scored profile that may be all you need.

If the answer has real branches in it, a self-employed stretch, a regulated occupation, a prior refusal, a child near an age ceiling, or three countries you cannot rank, the NextMigrate personal migration roadmap is priced at $499, reduced from $999, and is started with a $99 deposit with the balance settled afterwards. That is our own price, published on our pricing page, and the page there is the current figure. You receive the document described above: the eligibility read, the routes that survived and the rules that eliminated the rest, the checklist with every issuing body named, the sequencing calendar, the dated cost table, and the page stating what was not assessed. See pricing for the full description and its limits.

Then take the plan to an adviser licensed or registered in your destination country before you file.

One last time, plainly: this article and the document it describes are general information. They are not legal or immigration advice, and nothing here has been checked against your own facts. Rules, fees, occupation lists, points tables and processing times are set and revised by the destination government, and only the issuing authority's own page is current. Before you spend money or file anything, have an adviser who is licensed or registered to give immigration advice in your destination country confirm your case.